| « home | Browsing all comments (spoilers: on | off) (info: on | off) | next 25 |
 |
<Jim> Yes, I agree they should stay up temporarily to let players have fun trying to solve them. I'm actually really pleased that we were able to get hard levels from all these mods, 4 days ago it was just too easy for my liking. <Dave> (SPOILER) Funny thing is, I had been sitting on the 29 solution for ages, but didn't use it because I didn't like it. I had actually been working on ways to incorporate parts of it without destroying the idea behind the solution it cooks... and totally failed. Once 28 was posted, the game was up anyway, so I just did 29, ctrl-zeroed and uploaded whatever came out. I think these cook levels (28-31) need to stay up temporarily, just so that everybody can see them otherwise the same cooks will come around again. <Jim> I'm starting to get the levels mixed up, but I think 28-30 should definitely get deleted. I just made 30 to show the problem with 28 and 29 and let the others try to find the shortcut. I don't intend to keep it. Its amazing to me how many different ways we have found to solve these, each new mod had me stumped for a period of time, so they have been fun to play. 25, 26 and 27 may all be keepers, from what I remember they all had unique solutions that used most of the resources. Maybe we just need to make sure they are cook-free. <Dave> PS. Kirima, I was looking back through comments and it seems I missed your earlier post. Can we put it down to miscommunication and cross-posting? Sorry, I must have misunderstood. <Dave> (SPOILER) To be fair Jim, and I assume the same applies to you and pretty much everybody else, I don't think I've solved any of these recent levels, apart from my own (and they were only to highlight cooks anyway), without cooking them. This is getting to the point where half the level is redundant (see 31). Believe me, I have spent a lot of hours trying to create a mod which uses all of the resources, but every time I cook myself and another one goes on the scrapheap. Wondering if we need to go back to 25, make it more rigid (which will necessitate making it more obvious) and rebuild from there. Any thoughts? |
 |
<Dave> 'No mod cons 31' uploaded by Dave: Cooked, cooked, and cooked again. It might be time to skip back a few levels and try and block this little lot |
|
|
<Jim> 'No mod cons 30' uploaded by Jim: This is the cook to level 28 and 29. |
 |
<mm> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 1026 moves (old: 1149). |
 |
<mm> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 1157 moves (old: 1990). |
 |
<Jim> Moved to graveyard: No longer needed. |
 |
<mm> (SPOILER) Added solution "More elegant": This seems to look better, even if it's way slower. |
|
|
<Dave> 'No mod cons 29' uploaded by Dave: Solution works on 27 and 28. |
|
|
<mm> 'No mod cons 28' uploaded by mm: This fallows Henri's version, it's kind of 26b. |
 |
<mm> Moved to graveyard: Obsolete as well. |
 |
<mark> 'Mini mods 6' uploaded by mark: Bit more stuff, still no difficulty yet. |
 |
<mark> Moved to graveyard: not needed, mm that was a good idea with the teleport protection. |
|
|
<mark> 'No mod cons 27' uploaded by mark: Cranked up one more notch,original solution a bit messy. |
 |
<Dave> (SPOILER) This longer but much more sylish than my solution. Back to the drawing board. <Dave> (SPOILER) I was working on a mod when this popped up. Ctrl-zeroed, but different solution... interesting <noname> 'No mod cons 26' uploaded by noname: Really should have participated earlier, but I have been quite busy recently. |
 |
<Jim> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 47 moves (old: 51). <N7DOT 3> (SPOILER) Argh, that will need an increase in the level size to fix! |
 |
<Dave> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 233 moves (old: 235). |
 |
<Dave> Moved to graveyard. |
|
|
<devin> 'Mini mods 5' uploaded by devin: Just a small tweak to change the rigidity. |
| « home | Browsing all comments (spoilers: on | off) (info: on | off) | next 25 |