| « home | Browsing all comments (spoilers: on | off) (info: on | off) | next 25 |
 |
<N7DOT> (SPOILER) I get the feeling this is cookable, yet it manages to evade my attempts. If this is possible it would have to be really hard. |
 |
<N7DOT> 'Double Sokoban' uploaded by N7DOT: If anybody wants to try building a better sokoban pair using this concept, go ahead. The first puzzle is really easy, and the second puzzle is medium-easy, but the point is that the blocks and walls swap after the first half, so the walls become blocks and the blocks become walls. |
|
|
<benjamin> 'inversion 2' uploaded by benjamin: This has a similar idea as inversion but uses transponders and has no robots. |
 |
<mark> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 412 moves (old: 440). I must have went through everything that was not possible before finding the possible. Great mod Jim once again... |
 |
<N7DOT> (SPOILER) ... I'm also 99% sure that 71 moves is optimal, but here the proof is non-rigorous and may have a flaw. |
 |
<N7DOT> (SPOILER) I'm fairly sure my solution is provably optimal through a parity argument (the number of steps required to get to exit if the gate cell is initially left untouched must be even, and the distance from the goal the generation before it is on must be greater than 1. so for even parity this is the fastedt possible. for odd parity, you need to go up and around the bot, which takes 4 moves, which is at least 3 moves slower as the parity change saves one move (and yes, I have found the 53 move solution.) <N7DOT> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 50 moves (old: 59). multitasking <N7DOT> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 59 moves (old: 60). One move shaved... <benjamin> 'inversion' uploaded by benjamin. |
|
|
<N7DOT> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 71 moves (old: 73). even better <N7DOT> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 73 moves (old: 77). Found a speedrun while away from my home computer. |
 |
<mark> Moved to graveyard: Schoolboy error,can't believe i changed the panel from blue to grey. Nicely pointed out Jim. <Jim> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 348 moves (old: 455). Speaking of cooks, sorry Mark. |
|
|
<Jim> 'Crunches IV' uploaded by Jim: Another way. |
|
|
<mark> I meant shortcut not cook. <mark> 'Crunches III again' uploaded by mark: A little tighter,cook fixed. |
 |
<mark> (SPOILER) Added speedrun: 413 moves (old: 523). |
 |
<mark> Moved to graveyard: Not needed anymore |
 |
<Dave> (SPOILER) Where did 7 come from? |
|
|
<N7DOT> (SPOILER) Nicely done mark. (I found this harder than the 'original' plain Crunches, but a 7 is just a bit too high of a rating, at least for me.) |
|
|
<Dave> (SPOILER) Mark, the comment about radiant was a jocular reference to the now defunct 'malformed' series. These were made, presumably, by directly hacking the .esx file thereby circumnavigating the sanity restrictions in the editor. There was a certain 'Oh, yeah!' moment when that animation bug showed up, it was so reminscent of those levels. I did load your level into the editor to find the key remotes. Buggered if I was going to use trial and error :-). It's hard to know what's best for d-maps. I like orthagonality but is purely a point of style. On a complex level, they are probably more decypherable than a screen full of random spaghetti. |
|
|
<N7DOT> (SPOILER) I should mention the 'i' key shortcut was useful for cutting out the repetition of 100 to 200 moves when I was creating the solution to this level so I could solve it. |
 |
<N7DOT> Moved to graveyard: Obsolete and cook fix is uploaded. |
|
|
<N7DOT> 'Crunches III' uploaded by N7DOT: The second Crunches, tightened and fixed. |
|
|
<N7DOT> I'm uploading a fix soon... |
| « home | Browsing all comments (spoilers: on | off) (info: on | off) | next 25 |