| Comments
(turn spoilers on) |
 |
| 14255 |
Double Take = No Take?!?!? (A.K.A. Makes Sense But Shouldn't.... |
Tom 7 (1) |
Mon 16 Aug 2010 06:46 |
|
| |
(admin) Automatically moved to minor leagues.
(Difficulty: 1.1 Style: 1.8) |
| |
| 14238 |
Double Take = No Take?!?!? (A.K.A. Makes Sense But Shouldn't.... |
radiant (1469) |
Wed 11 Aug 2010 01:05 |
|
| |
It makes perfect sense, as long as nothing's actually stepping *off* the panel that turn. Dalek collisions can be tricky like that. |
| |
| 14237 |
Double Take = No Take?!?!? (A.K.A. Makes Sense But Shouldn't.... |
N7DOT 3 (2490) |
Tue 10 Aug 2010 23:27 |
|
| |
'Double Take = No Take?!?!? (A.K.A. Makes Sense But Shouldn't... Wait, What?)' uploaded by N7DOT 3:
Is This A Bug? Two Panels pressed targeting same tile = no result, but the same panel triggering twice resulting in no flip doesn't seem right. |
| |
